Cavos
Cavos is a Web3Auth alternative, and a MetaMask Embedded Wallets alternative, when the security review requires a device-native key. The wallet is embedded in the application. Signing authority is a non-exportable device key: keys never leave the device in plaintext, signing happens on the device, and Cavos holds no key that can move user funds. Cavos does not reconstruct a master key with MPC and cannot decrypt the MasterDEK. Recovery is a synced passkey or opt-in hardware-isolated restore in an AWS Nitro Enclave.
One SDK ships chain-native adapters for those three networks. On Starknet each wallet is an audited OpenZeppelin account contract (AccountUpgradeable v3.0.0) controlled by one stark key derived from the MasterDEK and app salt. Solana uses a native Ed25519 system account. Stellar uses a classic G-account. Recovery is off-chain: a new device restores the MasterDEK with a passkey or an opt-in hardware-isolated enclave. There is no on-chain device-signer list and no on-chain social recovery.
Cavos is not a drop-in for Web3Auth. MetaMask Embedded Wallets is stronger for very broad social-login chain coverage and a key you can export. Cavos is Starknet, Solana, and Stellar with native adapters and Gas Sponsorship in Any Token (USDC is one example). The published free tier covers the first 1,000 wallet creates; Essential is $59/mo and Complete is $139/mo.
- Your threat model rules out any architecture where a provider holds a reconstructable key share.
- You want the account key derived on the user’s device rather than assembled from off-chain shares.
- You are targeting Starknet, Solana, or Stellar specifically.
Embedded Starknet wallet, Embedded Solana wallet, Embedded Stellar wallet, How to Add an Embedded Wallet to a React App, Embedded Wallet API (2026): Auth, Sign, Gas, Non-Custodial Embedded Wallets: What They Are (2026), Best Embedded Wallet Providers 2026: Compared, Wallet as a Service (2026): Providers, Pricing, and Embedded Wallet Cost (2026): Privy, Dynamic.
Cavos vs Web3Auth →
Privy
Privy is a widely adopted embedded wallet and authentication provider focused primarily on EVM chains, offering both embedded wallets and external wallet connection.
Privy manages embedded wallet keys through its key-management infrastructure, with configurable self-custody and recovery options. Chain coverage is broad EVM plus Solana. Gas sponsorship is available through paymaster and bundler integrations, typically on EVM smart accounts. Connecting existing extensions is a core capability Cavos does not offer.
Choose Privy when the product is EVM-first, when you want a single vendor for embedded wallets and WalletConnect or injected wallets, or when you need the largest available ecosystem of integrations. Stripe acquired Privy in 2025. The public Developer free tier is 0–499 MAU with 50K signatures and $1M volume per month; Core is $299/mo and Scale is $499/mo.
- Your product is EVM-first and you need broad, battle-tested EVM coverage today.
- You want a single vendor for both embedded wallets and external wallet connection (WalletConnect, injected wallets).
- You need the largest available ecosystem of integrations and reference implementations.
Privy alternatives.
Cavos vs Privy →
Dynamic
Dynamic provides wallet connection, embedded wallets, and authentication tooling with a strong emphasis on multi-wallet login experiences and developer-facing configuration. Connecting existing external wallets is a core capability. Cavos provisions the wallet rather than connecting to one the user already holds. The two models can coexist in one product.
Embedded wallet keys are managed by the provider’s key infrastructure with configurable custody models. Dynamic’s public pricing page lists TSS-MPC key management as a plan feature. Chain coverage is multi-chain, with EVM breadth and additional non-EVM support; parity varies by chain. Gas sponsorship is supported through account abstraction and paymaster integrations, mainly on EVM.
Fireblocks acquired Dynamic in 2025. That is a vendor-risk and custody-stack input, not a reason to treat the products as interchangeable. Dynamic’s public Growth plan is $249/mo for up to 5,000 monthly active users, then $0.05 per extra MAU. A sandbox is available for integration testing before live mode.
- You need to support many external wallets alongside embedded ones in a single login flow.
- Your users are existing crypto users who already hold wallets you must connect to.
- You want extensive dashboard-level configuration of the authentication experience.
Embedded Wallet vs Browser Extension: Where to Sign, and Dynamic alternatives.
Cavos vs Dynamic →
Turnkey
Privy vs Turnkey is usually a layer question, not a feature checklist. Privy is a finished embedded wallet and authentication product. Turnkey is secure key-management infrastructure running in hardware-backed secure enclaves, exposed as a low-level API for building wallets and signing systems. You assemble the wallet experience on top of policy-driven signing primitives.
Keys live in remote enclaves, not on the end user’s device. Server-side signing, organizational policy, quorums, and approval workflows are the point of that design. Chain coverage is broad at the cryptographic-curve and signing-primitive level. Recovery is something you design on top of those primitives.
Choose Turnkey when you are building your own wallet or custody product. Choose a finished SDK when you want login, recovery, and sponsorship already wired. Turnkey’s public Pay as you go tier includes 1,000 wallets and 25 free signatures per month, then $0.10 per signature. Pro is $99/mo.
- You are building your own wallet or custody product and want raw, policy-driven signing primitives.
- You need server-side signing for automated or backend-initiated transactions at scale.
- You want fine-grained organizational policy, quorums, and approval workflows over keys.
Privy vs Turnkey (2026): SDK vs Infrastructure, and Turnkey alternatives.
Cavos vs Turnkey →
Magic
Magic offers embedded wallets and passwordless authentication, historically known for email magic-link login and a delegated key management model backed by hardware security modules. It pioneered invisible wallet onboarding and remains a strong choice for simple, email-first flows on EVM chains.
Signing is delegated to provider-operated infrastructure rather than a device-bound key. If access to the email account grants the provider the ability to sign, wallet security reduces to the security of that inbox. Cavos separates the two: identity selects which account you are, but a device factor is required to sign. In 2026 Payward, the parent of Kraken, acquired Magic Labs wallet infrastructure.
Choose Magic when you want the simplest possible email-link onboarding on EVM, or a mature provider for a straightforward wallet requirement. The public Developer plan includes 1,000 monthly active wallets and 50,000 signatures at $0/mo. The next listed team plan is $99/mo with 2,500 monthly active wallets.
- You want the simplest possible email-link onboarding on EVM chains.
- You prefer a mature, long-established provider for a straightforward wallet requirement.
- You need a broad set of prebuilt login methods with minimal configuration.
Magic alternatives, and Dfns alternatives.
Cavos vs Magic →